Friday, March 13, 2009

AIDS: A Biowarfare Scourge

House subcommittee meetings can be dull affairs and, therefore, not well attended. But, on occasion, the subcommittee on military appropriations can be eyebrow raising. For example, a Department of Defense Biological Research administrator arrived at a June 9, 1969 session to request funds to carry out an untoward research project. Dr. Donald MacArthur made this prediction: "Within five to ten years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which would differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease." The simplest explanation for Dr. MacArthur's statement is the creation of a virus that would destroy the immune system. MacArthur received the funds when he offered that any enemy would deploy the virus if that enemy developed it. By 1978 the first cases of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) emerged in Africa.

A coincidence is readily apparent: Is AIDS the zenith of biowarfare experiments?

Theodore Weiss, a US Congressman from New York, represents a large gay electorate. Weiss opined in 1983 that "attitudes toward homosexuals and homosexuality by some segments of society, the possible utilization of biological weapons must be seriously considered."

The groups the AIDS virus targets suggests an biowarfare slant. Keep in mind no one is actually immune from this virus, certain groups are more vulnerable: Africans, drug users, gays. Evidence for a biowarfare angle is sparse. The interesting thing is the same holds for the US government's theory for the spread of AIDS in the human population. Monkeys spread the virus. This premise is flimsy.

The generally accepted origin of AIDS is the virus tagged HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) was identified by Dr. Robert Gallo in 1984 and by a group of French scientists at about the same time. Essentially, Dr. Gallo observes the smimilarity between a simian virus (STLV-III) and HIV. Gallo observed that a monkey (so called green monkeys) carried this virus transmitted it to an African. Within a brief span of years, people were dying from having sex and blood transfusions. The monkey transmission system is a mere educated guess.

All of this gets to a horrendous notion: the government can be callously ruthless on occasion. One particularly horrific example is the 1931 Puerto Rico cancer research study. Several Puerto Ricans were purposely infected with cancer by Chief Pathologist Cornelius Rhoades of the Rockefeller Institute. Thirteen of those subjects died. How did Corkey justify those unnecessary deaths:

"The Porto (Rhoades' intentional misspelling) Ricans are the dirtiest, laziest, degenerate and thievish race of men ever inhabiting this sphere." Rhoades continued, "I have done my best to further the process of extermination by killing off eight and transplanting cancer into several more . . . . All physicians take delight in the abuse and torture of the unfortunate subjects."

Rhoades' is brutish and bigoted, but never charged in court for abusing his position. He was termed only "mentally ill," but the US DoD saw him differently and gave Rhoades responsibility for two large chemical warfare projects during the 1940's. Eventually, he was given a Legion of Merit and a seat on the Atomic Energy Commission.

What of the biowarfare research? A particular virus that attracted the military's attention was the canis strain of brucella. The symptoms are known ones: headaches, fever, general malaise, muscle pain, pharyngitis, and lymphadenopathy--the same symptoms seen in the AIDS-Related Complex, the percursor to AIDS itself.

Interestingly, the first report of the biowarfare nature of AIDS was printed in a New Delhi, India newspaper, The Patriot, for July 4, 1984. This article incorporated citations from an official US Army research publication about "natural and artificial influences on the human immune system."

What was really intriguing was that this Indian article stated that Fort Detrick researchers (home of the National Cancer Institute's Frederick Cancer Reserch Facilty, originally styled the US Army Biological Warfare Laboratory) safariied into Africa to search for "a powerful virus that could not be found in Europe or Asia." The gathered data was studied at Fort Detrick and "the result was the isolation of a virus that causes AIDS."

Eventually, two French-born East German scientists, Jakob and Lilli Segal authored a pamphlet AIDS: USA Home-Made Evil. The pamphlet's central premise was that AIDS was the product of biowarfare experiments. The Segals claimed that HIV is the product of genetically engineering a hybrid of the visan virus (a virus causing a sheep-borne brain disease) and a virus called HTLV-I (HIV was originally named HTLV-III), which causes white blood cell cancer. The Segals identified Fort Detrick as the inventing laboratory for this virus. One problem. Scant evidence exists that HIV was synthesized at Fort Detrick, or elsewhere, but the National Institutes of Health did ask Fort Detrick military scientists to assist in developing an AIDS cure.

The AIDS saga gets better. In 1987 Col. David Huxsoll, US Army (the US Army recurs throughout the AIDS story) gave away a bit of information in a tirade regarding the AIDS as a biowarfare weapon. The colonel said, "Studies at army laboratories have shown that the AIDS virus would be an extremely poor biological warfare agent." Col. Huxsoll retracted his statement, but the reporter who penned it, stands by the colonel's remark.

AIDS first broke out in the US in the gay male population at the same time that Reganism and the decrying of homosexuality arose. The biowarfare premise assumes that gay men were singled out for decimation and, even, scapegoating.

Consider in 1978 1000 plus, multiple partner gay men received experimental vaccinations against Hepatitis B, courtesy of the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control. Within six years, 64% of those gay men had developed AIDS. There is more to consider. Another vaccination program, for smallpox, in Africa. The World Health Organization (WHO) ran this program. The regions for the vaccinations became the most AIDS prone ones in Africa. The problem with these two vaccination programs is coincidence of the AIDS pandemic outbreak.

Dioxins and dengue virus have been mentioned as catalysts, as has a mutated form of syphilis.

In any explanations, AIDS/HIV is stealthy, prone to mutation, resiliant to vaccine. The underlying belief is that the human element cultivated it with a sinister motive.

References

Krupey, G.J. "AIDS: Act of God or the Pentagon?" Steamshovel Press, 4 (1992).

Rappaport, Jon. AIDS Inc.: Scandal of the Century. Foster City, CA: Human Energy Press, 1988.

9 comments:

  1. Makes one wonder. I recently read this article on the subject as well, see: http://gedankenfrei.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/aufgelesen-o1/

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is why I like having this blog. If I so desire, I can step away from the main thread and comment on whatsoever I please.

    Dewayne mentioned censorship at two blogs: Jim's and PC's. PC's I get why--it is deckstacking for victimizing underaged kids by pervs. As for Jim that is a different story. Jim is smarter and actually researches, something PC does not do thoroughly and never has.

    I have Will attempting to bait me into saying I was wrong about Beebs and his attacks directed at Sean and Grant and others, including myself, who support Sean and Grant against the unsubstantiated attacks against their character and motives in assisting the PSP to bring H&J to justice for murdering, Sean's one time victimizer Bryan Kocis. These attacks are organized, concerted efforts by Robert Wagner, now posting as NYCBoi2ThEMaX, formerly BB4Truth, Biohazard Boi, Bio Boi, BB. BB is a shared moniker, used mostly, by BF Ben but others at times as well. Will buys into the premise that Wagner has never blogged because he said so at PC's. To Goddamned bad RW got hauled into the DA's office after the IP associated with Beebs came up as originating at Wagner's NYC residence. Yep, that info was turned over to Grant who had it turned over to the prosecutors. Plausible deniabilty Will. Have someone else associated with the IP but control the words and tone yourself. Sophisticated, but still fraught with markers.

    I will cut to the chase. Wagner is a lying, boy raping, GHB doping pervert as much as his dead boss. Beebs is nothing more than his enabler. Both feed off one another.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting development in Jim's most recent comment thread. Seems Peter is upset that I stated that I wanted to hear from Sean Lockhart regarding Kocis' sister's statement as posted at PC's and reposted by Jim.

    I have late breaking news for Peter: I WILL POST MY OPINION AND COULDN'T CARELESS IF HE LIKES IT OR NOT. I know plenty of backstory.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How can one be in two places at once? Now that is a puzzler isn't it?

    If one is located in Alaska, why and how would IP addresses associated with that party continue to register in Virginia? Real stumper that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not so fast boys. The US Code which flows from the US Constitution controls what happens to persons "detained." Detention is a fancy way of saying placed into custody, that is, arrested.

    What exactly does the 234 Pennsylvania State Code have to say about the conditions of bail. The following settles the issue:

    Rule 522. Detention of Witnesses.

    (A) After an accused has been arrested for any offense, upon application of the attorney for the Commonwealth or defense counsel, and subject to the provisions of this chapter, a court may set bail for any material witness named in the application. The application shall be supported by an affidavit setting forth adequate cause for the court to conclude that the witness will fail to appear when required if not held in custody or released on bail. Upon receipt of the application, the court may issue process to bring any named witnesses before it for the purpose of demanding bail.

    (B) If the material witness is unable to satisfy the conditions of the bail bond after having been given immediate and reasonable opportunity to do so, the court shall commit the witness to jail, provided that at any time thereafter and prior to the term of court for which the witness is being held, the court shall release the witness when the witness satisfies the conditions of the bail bond.

    (C) Upon application, a court may release a witness from custody with or without bond, or grant other appropriate relief.

    Comment

    This rule does not permit a witness to be detained prior to the arrest of the defendant, since an arrest might never take place and the witness could be held indefinitely.

    ‘‘Conditions of the bail bond’’ as used in this rule include the conditions set forth in Rule 526(A) and the conditions of release defined in Rules 524, 527, and 528.

    Pursuant to paragraph (C), a witness may be released on his or her own recognizance conditioned upon the witness’ written agreement to appear as required. See Rule 524.

    This rule does not affect the compensation and expenses of witnesses under the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 5903, or the provisions of the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Within or Without a State in Criminal Proceedings. See 42 Pa.C.S. § § 5963(c) and 5964(b) relating to bail.

    In cases in which bail is set for a material witness pursuant to this rule, the court should consider all the types of release permitted in Rule 524 and the conditions of nonmonetary release upon bail available under Rule 527. When a material witness is to be detained, the court should impose the least restrictive means of assuring that witness’ presence, including the use of release on the witness’ own recognizance or release upon other nonmonetary conditions, such as electronic monitoring, especially when the witness has limited financial means to post monetary bail.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Pennsylvania code language on the subject and a reference to material witnesses. Material Witnees--Renee Martin's status. Guess I can read what the Bail Bond Affidavit stated despite the fact that two pages were intentionally left out.

    Key word in Paragraph A above is arrested. How do we know that Martin was arrested and arraigned--the Bail Bond Affidavit and Elm's statement of how Martin came to be translated from Ft. Worth, Texas to Luzerne Cty, Pennsylvania.

    Arrest is to detain or place into custody, for disposition at the discretion of the court.

    Anything else Will?

    ReplyDelete
  6. "despite the fact that two pages were intentionally left out."

    Care to share a copy of these pages?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Peter, I am honored. We've been through this before Peter. You posted Renee Martin's Bail Bond Affidavit with pages one (1) and two (2) left out. I pointed that out to you at the time of the post. You told me it was an unintentional oversight that you would be correcting. You are missing the pages of that document that follows the Pennsylvania rule governing material witnesses in a criminal matter. Get off your ass, find it, and post the errata :-).

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Get off your ass, find it, and post the errata :-)."

    Considering it's now 3 months later... by all means Rob... show us these 'missing' pages. You know you can't... as your claim is a lie... please prove me wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No Peter. WE are talking about your post at your blog as originally posted. You were in contact at the time with the Queen of Spin herself. Seems she lied to you. Tough.

    What I have written, I have written: Get off of your ass Peter and do your own work.

    ReplyDelete